Scoring Rubric |
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
Not Included |
Ideas & Content |
Title emphasizes main idea |
Title is present
|
Title lacks originality |
|
|
|
Relevant, engaging attention getter |
Attn. getter is present |
Attn. getter is not engaging and/or relevant |
|
|
|
Intro. includes thorough background on author |
Intro. includes background on author |
Intro. includes little background on author |
|
|
|
Intro. includes thorough background on setting |
Intro. includes background on setting |
Intro. includes little background on setting |
|
|
|
Intro. includes thorough background on novel |
Intro. includes background on novel |
Intro. includes little background on novel |
|
|
|
Introduction includes summary of novel |
Introduction includes summary of novel |
Introduction includes summary of novel |
|
|
|
Clear, focused & relevant thesis statement contains theme(s) and literary device(s) to be discussed |
Thesis statement contains theme and literary device to be discussed |
Thesis statement does not contains theme and/or literary device to be discussed, may be off topic |
|
|
|
Each body paragraph contains a topic sentence w/theme to be discussed |
Each body paragraph contains a topic sentence w/theme to be discussed |
Topic sentences are vague and/or do not contain theme |
|
|
|
Each body paragraph begins with topic sentence that is clearly related to the thesis statement
|
Each body paragraph contains at least 2 specific examples to support topic sentence |
Body paragraph(s) contain 1 example, which may not support topic sentence; examples used lack specificity |
|
|
|
Each body paragraph contains at least 3 specific examples to support topic sentence |
Each body paragraph contains at least 2 specific examples to support topic sentence |
Body paragraph(s) contains fewer than 2 examples, which may not support topic sentence |
|
|
|
Each example is thoroughly explained: who, what, how, why? |
Each example is explained: who, what, how, why? |
Some examples may exist but are not linked back to the author’s main ideas |
|
|
|
The significance/importance of each example is thoroughly explained in detail & connected to thesis |
The significance - important of each example is explained & connected to thesis |
The explanation of significance - important of each example lacks detail and/or clarity |
|
|
|
Accurate & detailed explanations are relevant & prove thesis |
Explanations attempt to prove thesis/topic sentences & are relevant |
Explanations/evidence Commentary veers off topic or lack some relevance |
|
|
|
3+ direct quotations are seamlessly introduced & explained in the essay |
3 direct quotations are included in the essay, introduction or explanation may be problematic |
Quotations are included, but may be poorly introduced and/or explanations are lacking in detail |
|
|
|
Analysis presented in thoughtful & original way, relates evidence back to thesis |
Analysis present but lacks breadth & depth |
Little analysis is present, lacks breadth & depth |
|
|
|
Conclusion provides sense of closure & includes reiteration of thematic statement |
Conclusion is present; includes reiteration of thematic statement |
Conclusion lacking in relevancy and/or thematic statement off topic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization |
Essay contains intro., multiple supporting paragraphs & conclusion |
Essay contains intro., at least 1supporting paragraph & a conclusion |
Paper may be lacking intro., supporting paragraph and/or conclusion. |
|
|
|
Fluid and logical structure which employs effective transitions within & between paragraphs |
Structure is present, but does not help reader understand content clearly, Transitions exist |
Little to no structure and makes reading difficult; Transitions are weak or are almost non-existent
|
|
Organization |
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
Not Included |
|
|
Order of information is deliberate and makes sense |
Order of information makes sense |
Information appears in random order and/or does not make sense |
|
|
|
Arguments are clearly linked back to the prompt |
Arguments are linked back to the prompt |
Arguments are not linked back to the prompt |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
Style |
Formal diction & tone (no slang or clichés) |
Formal diction & tone (no slang or clichés) |
Informal diction & tone used, slang and/or clichés present |
|
|
|
Sentences of variety & structure |
Sentences lack some variety and/or structure |
Generally, sentences of little or not variety & structure employed |
|
|
|
Varied & engaging word choice, sophisticated vocabulary employed |
Varied word choice employed, could use some work on vocabulary usage |
Vocabulary use needs improvement |
|
|
|
Avoids wordiness & repetition |
Avoids wordiness & repetition |
Frequently wordy and/or redundant |
|
|
|
No “forbidden” words; no personal pronouns |
Some “forbidden” words; no personal pronouns |
“Forbidden” words and/or personal pronouns used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar, Usage & Conventions |
Author demonstrates excellent spelling usage, no errors in homonyms
|
Spelling is adequate; there are minor error, but they do not affect readability; may contain homonym errors |
Proofreading is inadequate. There are significant errors in spelling, which impede readability |
|
|
|
Contains grammatically correct sentences |
There are some grammatical errors, but they do not impede readability |
Proofreading is inadequate. There are significant errors in grammar, which impede readability |
|
|
|
Correct capitalization & punctuation employed |
Proofreading has been employed, but there are errors in capitalization & punctuation, errors do not impede readability |
Proofreading is inadequate. There are significant errors in capitalization & punctuation. Errors impede readability. |
|
|
|
Active Verbs used, Tense stays consistent |
Verb Tense stays consistent |
Verb Tense is inconsistent |
|
|
|
Prepositions are used correctly |
There are errors in usage of prepositions, errors do not impede readability
|
Proofreading is inadequate. There are significant errors in usage of prepositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MLA |
3+ internal citations properly formatted |
There are 3 internal citations properly formatted |
Fewer than 3 citations are present but contain errors in formatting |
|
|
|
Quotes 4 lines or more are indented & double spaced |
quotes 4 lines or more are indented & double spaced |
quotes 4 lines or more are not indented and/or double spaced |
|
|
|
Works Cited page is arranged alphabetically and in correct format |
Works Cited page is present but contains some errors |
Works cited page may be incomplete and/or is not properly formatted, major errors exist |
|
Formatting |
Essay is word processed, double spaced, with 1” margins |
Essay is word processed, double spaced, with 1” margins |
Essay is not word processed and/or double spaced, margins -/+ 1” |
|
Comments: