Embedded Assessment 1: Personal Narrative/Memoir Rubric
|
Criteria |
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets
|
Does Not
Yet
|
|
Presentation of the Narrative
|
Clear focus, subject conveys the narrative and provides meaningful insight into the thoughts and ideas of the characters involved. Voice and tone are appropriate for audience & purpose. Transitions enhance story. |
Subject of the story conveys an event. Some insight into thoughts/ideas present. Voice & tone are apparent. Transitions are present. |
Subject does not convey a clear narrative and/or story is not developed. Lacks clear insight. Voice and/or tone are inappropriate for audience or purpose. Transitions are ineffective or missing. |
|
Use of Description, Detail, and Dialogue |
Description, detail, and dialogue enhance the event and make the story come alive for the reader. It shows, not tells. |
Uses description, detail, and dialogue to recount the story. (More showing than telling.) |
In telling the story, description, detail, and/or dialogue is not apparent - or it is very weak. |
|
Sensory Details |
Sensory details help the reader establish setting or plot and further the reader’s understanding of the story. |
Sensory details are incorporated in the story. |
Sensory details do not help the reader establish setting or plot and do not further the reader’s understanding of the story. |
|
Language and Writing Conventions: |
Writing conventions and language contain few errors. Student uses appropriate conventions and mechanics, i.e. spelling, grammar, verb tense, subject-verb agreement, capitalization, punctuation (esp. commas), vocabulary usage, sentence structures and sentence variety. There are few, if any, grammatical errors. |
Language and writing conventions are used correctly, with some occasional errors. Student’s writing is limited by an inappropriate use of proper conventions and mechanics, i.e. spelling, grammar, verb tense, subject-verb agreement, capitalization, punctuation (esp. commas), vocabulary usage, sentence structures and sentence variety. There are more than a few major grammatical errors. |
Language and writing conventions contain many errors. Student’s writing is riddled with inappropriate and inconsistent use of proper conventions and mechanic. The writing is plagued by numerous grammatical errors. |
|
Drafts, revisions, outline and pre-writing is included with final draft |
Student has included all elements of writing process. |
One element of writing process is not included. |
There is more than one missing element of the writing process. |
|
Use of Grading Rubric |
Student has self-edited more than once using the rubric and has had more than one peer editor. |
Student has self-edited using the rubric and had one peer editor. |
Student has not self-edited, nor had a peer editor. |
*Is the lead enticing?
* What devices has the writer used to engage the reader?
* Where does the story seem to be going? Are there passages that require more description or follow up? Which passages are the
most/least effective? Does anything need to be rephrased?
* What is the tone? How do you know? How do you know how the author feels? Choose the words/phrases that show you that?