Scoring Rubric |
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
Not Included |
Ideas & Content |
Title emphasizes main idea |
Title is present |
Title lacks originality |
|
|
|
Relevant, engaging attention getter |
Attn. getter is present |
Attn. getter is not engaging and/or relevant |
|
|
|
Clear, focused & relevant thesis statement contains topic, +/- impact & 3 perspectives to be addressed in the paper. |
Thesis statement contains topic, +/- impact & 3 perspectives to be addressed in the paper. |
Thesis statement is lacking topic and/or 3 perspectives to be addressed in the paper. |
|
(Social, economic, psychological, geographical, political, cultural) |
Topic sentence in 1st body paragraph clearly identifies social science perspective to be discussed & is related to the thesis |
Topic sentence in 1st body paragraph contains social science perspective to be discussed; it is related to thesis |
Topic sentence in 1st body is vague and does not contain perspective to be discussed |
|
|
|
1st body paragraph contains at least 3 specific examples to support topic sentence& clearly identifies the + or – impact of the topic |
1st body paragraph contains at least 2 specific examples to support topic sentence & clearly identifies the + or – impact of the topic |
1st body paragraph contains 1 example, which may not support topic sentence; examples used lack specificity |
|
(Social, economic, psychological, geographical, political, cultural) |
Topic sentence in 2nd body paragraph clearly identifies social science perspective to be discussed & is related to the thesis |
Topic sentence in 2nd body paragraph identifies social science perspective to be discussed; it is related to thesis |
Topic sentence in 2nd body is vague and does not contain perspective to be discussed |
|
|
|
2nd body paragraph contains at least 3 specific examples to support topic sentence& clearly identifies the + or – impact of the topic |
2nd body paragraph contains at least 2 specific examples to support topic sentence & identifies the + or – impact of the topic |
2nd body paragraph contains 1 example, which may not support topic sentence; examples used lack specificity |
|
(Social, economic, psychological, geographical, political, cultural) |
Topic sentence in 3rd body paragraph clearly identifies social science perspective to be discussed & is related to the thesis |
Topic sentence in 3rd body paragraph identifies social science perspective to be discussed; it is related to thesis |
Topic sentence in 3rd body is vague and does not contain perspective to be discussed |
|
|
|
3rd body paragraph contains at least 3 specific examples to support topic sentence & clearly identifies the + or – impact of the topic |
3rd body paragraph contains at least 2 specific examples to support topic sentence & identifies the + or – impact of the topic |
3rd body paragraph contains 1 example, which may not support topic sentence; examples used lack specificity . Body paragraph(s) do not identify the + or – impact of the topic |
|
|
|
Evidence is relevant, accurate, detailed,, and thoroughly explains who, what, how, why? |
Evidence is relevant and accurate, attempts to explain who, what, how, why? |
Explanations/evidence /commentary veers off topic or lack some relevance, explanations are not thorough |
|
|
|
The significance/importance of examples is thoroughly explained in detail & connected to thesis |
The significance/important of examples is explained & connected to thesis |
The significance and/or important of examples lacks detail and/or clarity |
|
|
|
The paper is persuasive and clearly PROVES the thesis |
The paper is persuasive and PROVES thesis. |
The paper does not PROVE the thesis. |
|
|
|
2+ direct quotations are seamlessly introduced & explained in the essay; all paraphrase(s) must be cited internally |
2 direct quotations are included in the essay, introduction or explanation may be problematic; all paraphrase(s) must be cited internally |
Quotations are included, but may be poorly introduced and/or explanations are lacking in detail; paraphrase(s) are not cited internally |
|
|
|
Conclusion transitions out of paper, includes reiteration of thesis statement, a parting shot, & provides sense of closure |
Conclusion is present; includes reiteration of thesis statement; contains 2 of 3 required elements |
Conclusion lacking in reiteration of arguments, relevancy, thesis statement, parting shot and/or is off topic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization |
Essay contains intro., multiple supporting paragraphs & conclusion |
Essay contains intro., at least 1 supporting paragraph & a conclusion |
Paper lacks intro., supporting paragraph and/or conclusion. |
|
|
|
Order of information is deliberate and makes sense; Information from the thesis statement is addressed, in order. (Check the 1st sentence of each paragraph.) |
Order of information makes sense; Information from the thesis statement is addressed, in order. (Check the 1st sentence of each paragraph.) |
Information appears in random order and/or does not make sense. |
|
|
|
Fluid and logical structure, includes introduction, clearly focused topic sentences, supporting paragraphs, a conclusion, and employs effective transitions within & between paragraphs |
Structure is present, includes introduction, topic sentences, supporting paragraphs and a conclusion; Transitions exist |
Little structure, makes rdg. difficult; may not include intro. topic sentences, or supporting paragraphs; Transitions are weak or are almost non-existent |
|
|
|
Arguments are clearly linked back to the prompt |
Arguments are linked back to the prompt |
Arguments are not linked back to the prompt |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
Style |
Formal diction & tone (no slang or clichés) |
Formal diction & tone (no slang or clichés) |
Informal diction & tone used, slang and/or clichés present |
|
|
|
Sentences of variety & structure |
Sentences lack some variety and/or structure |
Generally, sentences of little variety & lacking in structure |
|
|
|
Varied & engaging word choice, sophisticated vocabulary employed |
Varied word choice employed, work on vocabulary usage |
Vocabulary use needs improvement |
|
|
|
Avoids wordiness & repetition |
Some wordiness and/or repetition present |
Frequently wordy and/or redundant |
|
( personal pronouns, got, etc.) |
No “forbidden” words; no personal pronouns |
Some “forbidden” words; no personal pronouns |
“Forbidden” words and/or personal pronouns used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar, Usage & Conventions |
Author demonstrates excellent spelling usage, no errors in homonyms
|
Spelling is adequate; minor errors exist, but do not affect readability; may contain homonym errors |
Proofreading is inadequate. Significant errors in spelling, which impede readability |
|
|
|
Contains grammatically correct sentences |
There are some grammatical errors, but they do not impede readability |
Proofreading is inadequate. Significant errors in grammar impede readability |
|
|
|
Correct capitalization & punctuation employed |
Proofreading has been employed; errors in capitalization & punctuation, exist, but do not impede readability |
Proofreading is inadequate. Significant errors in capitalization & punctuation impede readability. |
|
|
|
Active Verbs used, Tense stays consistent |
Verb Tense stays consistent |
Verb Tense is inconsistent |
|
|
|
Prepositions are used correctly |
Errors in usage of prepositions exist, but do not impede readability. |
Proofreading is inadequate. There are significant errors in usage of prepositions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MLA |
3+ internal citations properly formatted; Quotes 4 lines or more are indented, double spaced & formatted properly |
There are 3 internal citations properly formatted; quotes 4 lines or more are indented, double spaced & formatted properly |
Fewer than 3 citations are present and/or contains errors in formatting; quotes 4 lines or more are not formatted properly |
|
|
|
Works Cited page is arranged alphabetically and in correct format |
Works Cited page is present but contains some errors |
Works cited page may be incomplete and/or is not properly formatted, major errors exist |
|
|
|
Plagiarism is clearly avoided. Excellent citations are provided. |
Plagiarism is clearly avoided. Citations are provided. |
Plagiarism has been committed. There is inadequate citing of sources. |
|
|
|
Quotations are punctuated correctly. |
Quotations are punctuated correctly. |
Quotations are not set up punctuated correctly. |
|
Formatting |
Essay is word processed in 12 pt. font, double spaced, with 1” margins |
Essay is word processed, double spaced, with 1” margins |
Formatting incorrect |
|
|
|
Cover page has name, date, teacher, class period? |
Cover page has name, date, teacher, class period? |
Cover page is missing 1: name, date, teacher, and/or period? |
|
Comments: